A front page story on the Wall
Street Journal declared "the age of cheap and easily pumped oil is over,"
and followed up
with several stories about a new crop of suburban farmers who are making
their first forays into self-sufficiency.
Five years ago, I was one of
the few lone voices out in the wilderness warning about peak oil, and all
that it means.
Oil had hit a new high around $35 and most traders were arguing that it would
soon fall back to $20.
Peak oil was considered a fringe
theory, and the financial media were absolutely sure that the market would
sort everything
out and let us all get back to our "Happy Motoring" fantasies. I had some
spirited discussions with investment analysts back then,
who basically thought that I just had an apocalyptic bent.
I stuck to my guns. I knew that
oil had begun a relentless rise as we approached the global peak of production,
and that the
Street was in for a rude awakening. And at the end of last year, I predicted
that 2008 would be the year that peak oil really hit the
mainstream, and the dialogue about energy would start to come around to reality.
Now, as oil hits record high
after record high, the Street's own paper of record has admitted that the
jig is up.
The whole world is finally starting to recognize that we've got a serious
problem on our hands, and no amount of "jaw-boning" the
Saudis is gonna fix it.
Maybe the change in attitude
had to do with hearing it straight from King Abdullah himself, who said last
week that he wasn't
interested in increasing Saudi production beyond its current level just to
satisfy the rapacious demand of Western consumers.
He's got his own country's future
to think about. "When there were some new finds, I told them, 'no, leave it
in the ground, with
grace from god, our children need it,'" he said.
One week later, U.S. Energy Secretary
Sam Bodman admitted that he was powerless to persuade them otherwise.
"I have done everything that I know how to do with OPEC," he said. "I have
a very good relationship with (Saudi oil minister A)
Naimi and all the people that work at OPEC. I wish they would open it up
and issue more oil. That's my wish but I can't order them to."
Bodman's admission comes about
a month after the White House admitted that it, too, was powerless over the
situation.
On March 13, while being grilled about high gasoline prices, White House
spokeswoman Dana Perino said
"It would be wrong of the President to provide false hope to people to think
that we are going to be able to have an immediate
impact to reduce gas prices
...This problem didn't get started overnight, and it's not going to be solved
overnight...
This is something we're going to have to all work through."
So why are gasoline prices so high?
Well, consider this: In general,
a $1 rise in the price of a barrel of crude oil adds about 1cent to the price
of a litre of gasoline.
Since oil prices have doubled since the beginning of 2007, you had to expect
gasoline prices to follow.
Of course, the story is a little
more complex than that. The factors that weigh on gasoline and oil prices
are many and interrelated.
But you'd never know it from most of the media coverage. In fact, I have
heard and read more myth than fact about gasoline prices.
It's an annual phenomenon. Every
year, as gasoline prices rise from their winter lows, we gather to wring our
hands and wonder
and worry what's going on. As if we'd never seen this happen before.
The outrage over gas prices is as regular as Groundhog Day.
Let's debunk this story and see if we can't get it right, for once.
Every time oil prices spike up
into a new trading range, you can bet that some Congressman will haul Big
Oil's CEOs into a
hearing and try to pin the blame on them. And this time is no different.
The lack of understanding of the oil markets demonstrated by our fearless leaders is truly appalling.
As ConocoPhillips Chief Executive James Mulva remarked one year ago, "Big Oil is not so big."
Big Oil controls only about
10% (at best) of the world's remaining oil reserves, and their share of daily
production is slowly
eroding. They have reached the point where the oil they produce is coming
out of their total reserves,
because they can't replenish it with new-found oil anymore.
Since the very basis for the
valuation of their companies is the inexorably falling reserves, big oil
companies are doing the
smart thing and buying back their shares. Wouldn't you, if the alternative
was to continue investing skyrocketing amounts
of money in order to drill dry holes in decreasingly interesting prospects?
Investigation after investigation
into alleged oil company profiteering hasn't resulted in one single prosecutable
charge.
It's simply barking up the wrong tree.
Remember: Oil is highly fungible.
Oil is traded on a global basis. And while Big Oil does benefit from higher
prices for their
diminishing barrels, they're not setting prices.
Traders are, and speculation
has been heavy. The amount of oil traded on paper far exceeds the amount of
oil that's actually
being sold.
This has prompted more Congressional
attention, and questions as to whether the rules for oil trading need to be
tightened to
keep out speculators.
That may be a good call actually,
but for now, the increasing price of oil remains partly due to the flight
to commodities,
which I have written about in recent columns.
That said, oil is still badly
underpriced on the basis of its true value. So the speculation may
in fact be a part of a normal
market, functioning as it should to find the correct price.
So: speculators, a qualified yes; Big Oil, not really.
Some have blamed high gasoline prices on low refinery output. After all, lower supply means higher prices, right?
Well...not exactly.
If you think gasoline prices are high now, consider this.
A year ago, the typical "crack
spread," or the profit on refining a barrel of oil, was over $20 a barrel,
and peaked at over $30.
Today, it's closer to $10 on average, and for the independent refiners, it's
absolutely dismal:
Source: PetroStrategies, using Oil & Gas Journal statistics
Consequently, refinery utilization
has been even lower than usual for this time of year, the "turnaround season"
when refiners
typically idle some equipment in order to prepare to produce the summer blends
of gasoline. Normally, refinery utilization in the
turnaround season is in the range of 85-90%, but this year it's barely above
80%.
So why have refining profits collapsed?
It's a squeeze play: Crude prices have gone up much more than gasoline prices for domestic refiners, squeezing out their profit.
So why have gasoline prices not kept up with crude?Part of the answer is reduced
domestic demand. High gasoline prices are really starting to hurt consumers,
and they're
cutting back on their trips. Still, although gasoline consumption has fallen
by a few percent year over year, total demand
will still rise about a half a percent this year.
The problem here is that the
elasticity of gasoline demand is really very low. Recent studies have suggested
that a quadrupling
of gasoline price only cuts demand by half, and that only 20% of the demand
reduction is due to driving less-the rest owes to
reduced vehicle ownership and better mpg.
But the bigger part of the answer
owes to a new dynamic in the gasoline trade: Finished gasoline imports have
increased
dramatically in the last several years, which has pressured prices for the
domestic refiners.
This is primarily because Europe
is increasingly choosing diesel over gasoline. Their diesel-sipping vehicles
are more efficient
and generate less emissions. As their diesel demand rises, they have more
finished gasoline to export to a hungry world market.
Were this not the case, gasoline
prices in the U.S. would have risen as fast as diesel.
Diesel prices have gone up twice as much as gasoline prices over the last
year:
Source: EIA
You might be surprised to know where all that imported gasoline is coming from. It's a very different list than our sources of crude:
Top 10 Sources U.S. Gasoline Imports, 2007 (million barrels)
|
1. |
United Kingdom |
25.1 |
|
2. |
U.S. Virgin Islands |
23.6 |
|
3. |
France |
11.2 |
|
4. |
Canada |
10.6 |
|
5. |
Netherlands |
10.5 |
|
6. |
Norway |
8.4 |
|
7. |
Germany |
8.4 |
|
8. |
Russia |
7.4 |
|
9. |
Italy |
7.2 |
|
10. |
OPEC Countries |
5.5 |
Source: EIA
So instead of blaming domestic
refining output for tight supply and high gasoline prices, we should be thanking
Europe for reducing their gasoline demand!
As we head into the "summer driving
season," with its higher demand and its requirements for specialized blends
of
gasoline, it seems likely to me that margins will head back into normal territory
for this time of year.
If we revisit last year's crack spread highs, gasoline prices could tack on another 48 to 72 cents per gallon!
That's why I've been predicting $4 gas by summer.
This is one of my favorites:
the claim that if only those damn environmentalists hadn't made much of our
offshore oil reserves
off limits to drilling, that we'd be enjoying gas prices under $2 again.
These people demonstrate a severe lack of comprehension about the concept of flow rates.
This is a familiar concept to
my regular readers. All together now: "It's not the size of the tank which
matters,
but the size of the tap."
When you're consuming 21 million
barrels a day (mbpd) of oil, bringing on a few field, even a "huge" field
producing a quarter
million or a half million barrels a day is still a drop in the bucket. It
might dampen the rate at which prices increase,
but it can't bring them down.
There is no turning back the
clock on the decline of U.S. oil output, which has been steadily falling
for 37 years despite massive
investment and the best technology in the world.
The most important reason usually goes unsaid: peak oil.
Even the IMF has obliquely admitted
there is a problem. Recently, deputy director John Lipsky said,
"While oil demand has remained robust, the supply side response to rising
prices has been disappointing."
And that's the bottom line right there.
You know the old saw: when you point the finger at somebody else, there are three pointing back at you.
While oil production has leveled
off, demand has not, and the reduced demand from the OECD is being more than
offset by the red-hot economies of the developing world.
For the first time this year,
the combined oil consumption of China, India, Russia and the Middle East will
exceed that of the U.S..
Even with all our efforts to curb domestic demand, worldwide oil demand will
increase about 2 percent this year.
Until global demand cools off, there's no way out of the oil price trap.
And however we choose to characterize the reasons, oil supply isn't increasing anymore. The tap is wide open.
The world is now perched precariously
on the plateau at the top of the global peak in oil production.
And it's not a long plateau.
It's doubtful if the world will be able to reduce its demand in time to prepare for the second half of the Age of Oil.
Oil will keep going higher, and
gasoline and diesel prices will follow it up-not precisely, and not immediately,
but they will follow.
And for once, the White House seems to have told the truth about energy:
There's really very little we can do about it.