Think that
has appeal? The 2009 Forester was launched April 1, and April sales were up
a stunning 49% from
a year ago.
Comparing the new Forester with its main rivals, Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4, is a "yes, but" exercise.
Yes, Forester
has a bit less cargo space with the back seats folded. But you'd hardly describe
its space as small.
And its rear opening is especially wide for big items.
Yes, Forester's
optional turbocharged four-cylinder engine is a ball, but you can get more
power from RAV4's V-6
on cheaper fuel than the premium that Forester's turbo favors. The V-6 RAV
and turbo Forester are close on price.
Yes, with
no but: Forester has a sophisticated all-wheel-drive (AWD) system standard,
as on all Subarus.
Rivals offer less-sophisticated setups as options.
Most automakers
favor AWD that is front-drive except when the rears are needed, supposedly
avoiding a
fuel-economy penalty from driving all wheels all the time. Forester has true
AWD — power always to all four wheels
— with no mileage penalty.
Fuel economy
for the non-turbo Forester is the same as or better than CR-V or RAV4 with
AWD. Forester's turbo
surrenders 2 miles per gallon to the V-6 RAV4 on the highway but otherwise
matches it.
Salients from driving a high-end XT (turbo) with most options and a high-end X (non-turbo):
•Styling. A wonderful improvement. Crisp, clean, forthright. Even the grille, not always a Subie strong point, looks OK.
The hood
scoop on the XT can be forgiven because it's functional, but the X silhouette
is more graceful.
The scoop channels air to the intercooler, a radiator that helps the turbo
pump cooler, denser air into the engine,
boosting performance.
•Interior.
The rear seat's now adult-friendly for two. The middle spot is compromised
by the high drive-shaft tunnel
and overhang of the front console.
Seats generally
are comfy, and lumbar adjustment has enough range to eliminate a bump-in-the-back
feel.
Rear-seat back angle adjusts for comfort.
Controls
and gauges are simple at a time when car companies like to absurdly complicate
them. Key stereo controls are
— ready for this? —on the stereo. Climate control's three big knobs
take any mystery out of managing the temperature
and defroster.
•Integrity. Effort went into things that matter, even those not obvious or sexy.
Rear suspension
is now double-wishbone instead of struts. That's a two-fer. That layout is
flatter than upright struts,
allowing wider cargo space. It also handles bumps and corners with more aplomb
than most struts for a smoother ride,
more precise steering and sportier driving feel. Driving time showed those
are real, not theoretical, advantages.
Forester snaps around corners with agility remarkable not only for an SUV,
but also for a small sedan. In fact, it's more
like a sedan than rivals, so it might be for you if your preferences skew
more to car than truck.
Foam bins under the rear floor easily stow miscellany, including rear head restraints if need be.
Forester
bumpers are built for a 5-mph jolt without damage. Many others' are built
to a 2.5-mph standard.
The cost and weight saved makes them popular with everyone except you and
your insurer.
The hood is held open with gas struts instead of a cheap, unwieldy rod that's often hot and dirty.
Four outlets, not two or zero, shoot air to the rear.
•Drivetrain.
The turbocharged engine is a hoot, punchy and playful. Yet it delivers
power smoothly from low engine
speeds, not explosively only after the engine revs up. Subie expects about
10% of buyers to go for the turbo.
What a kick the other 90% will miss.
The non-turbo
engine, at 170 hp, is sufficient unless you always run loaded (the vehicle,
not the driver) or tow
or live in the mountains.
The automatic
transmission has just four speeds in a universe of fives. Saves money, Subaru
says, helping keep
the base sticker less than US$20,000.
It shifted
well on the turbo, but not on the non-turbo. Too much delay before downshifts
under hard throttle.
And when passing or merging, you need those downshifts quicker in the non-turbo
to leverage the lower available power.
Manual-shift
mode was easy to use. Pull the lever toward you and snick forward to upshift,
backward to downshift.
Why automakers use any other system is beyond my ken. A "sport" mode seemed
to do little more than keep the
engine revved up, providing marginal performance enhancement while creating
more commotion and using more fuel.
All-wheel-drive
(AWD) on the test cars couldn't be bullied into misbehaving on wet streets,
even with XT's turbocharged
thrust. Wide-open throttle from a dead stop while turning 90 degrees caused
nothing worse than almost imperceptible
wheel spin and (in the turbo) lots of yank-'em, spank-'em acceleration. Turn
off stability control, expecting more drama,
and, nope, only a nit more wheel spin.
Subaru does AWD as well as Volvo does seats.
In the end,
you can make rational arguments for RAV4 and CR-V, but neither has the mix
of appealing personality,
sophisticated AWD, straightforward presentation and carlike manners that
give the new Forester exceptional allure.
ABOUT THE 2009 SUBARU FORESTER
What? Bigger, nicer overhaul of a pioneer in small crossover SUVs. Four-door, all-wheel drive.
Where? Built in Japan.
Why? Newer-design rivals — Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4, etc. — were eating its lunch.
How? Bigger chassis, new rear suspension, more refinement, cleaner styling.
How much?
Base X model with manual transmission starts at US$20,660, including $665
shipping.
XT turbo model loaded, about US$31,000.
Who? Subaru
expects buyers to have annual incomes of $75,000 to $100,000, frequently engineers
or
medical professionals, 85% master' s or higher college degrees, 55% or more
women.
How many? Won't say, but more per year than last year's 44,530.
How potent?
X models have 2.5-liter, four-cylinder engine rated 170 horsepower at 6,000
rpm, 170 pounds-feet
of torque at 4,400 rpm. XT models have same basic engine modified with dual-overhead-camshafts,
more sophisticated valve-timing technology and, most important, turbocharging.
Result: 224 hp at 5,200 rpm,
226 lbs.-ft. at 2,800 rpm.
Five-speed manual transmission standard; four-speed automatic optional.
How lavish?
Sufficiently. Among standard features: All-wheel drive (as all Subarus);
stability/traction control;
anti-lock brakes with force distribution and brake assist; side-impact air
bags in front, head-curtain bags front and rear;
5 mph bumpers (instead of common 2.5 mph); AM/FM/CD stereo with input jack;
air conditioning; cruise control;
trip computer; power steering, brakes, locks, windows, mirrors; tilt-adjustable
steering column; remote-control locks;
rear-window defroster.
How big?
Compact exterior, midsize interior (typical of this category). About 2 inches
longer, narrower than Honda CR-V
(best-selling SUV of any kind in the USA) and about 100 pounds lighter. Is
179.5 inches long, 70.1 inches wide, 66.9 inches
tall (with roof rack) on a 103-inch wheelbase. Weight: 3,250 to 3,460 lbs.
Passenger
space is listed as 107.6 cubic feet (102.1 cu. ft. with moonroof). Cargo
space in cu. ft.: 33.5 behind second row,
68.3 with second row (30.8 and 63 with moonroof).
Rated to carry 900 lbs. of people, cargo; tow 2,400 lbs.
Turning circle: 34.4 feet.
How thirsty?
X (non-turbo) models rated 20 miles per US gallon in town, 26 mpg highway,
22 combined;
XT (turbo) 19/24/21.
Trip computer
in XT test car showed 18.3 mpg in mixed suburban, freeway driving, 20.7 in
X test car. Regular (87 octane)
gasoline specified for X, premium (91 octane) for XT. Subaru says lower octane
is OK for XT for light duty, but use could
cause overheating in high-demand situations such as altitude, loads, frequent
hard acceleration.
Tank holds 16.9 gallons.
Overall: Fun, capable, comfortable and different.