Wankel engines theoretically
have have several major advantages over reciprocating
piston designs, in addition to having
higher output for similar
displacement and physical size. Wankel engines are considerably
simpler and contain far fewer moving parts.
For instance, because valving
is accomplished by simple ports cut into the walls of
the rotor housing, they have no valves or complex
valve trains. The elimination
of rotating parts not only makes a Wankel engine much
lighter (typically half that of a conventional engine with
equivalent power), but it also completely eliminates the reciprocating
mass of a piston engine with its internal strain and inherent
vibration
due to repetitious acceleration
and deceleration, producing not only a smoother flow
of power but also the ability to produce more power by running
at higher rpm.
However, this theoretical advantage
is obviously being overshadowed by reciprocating
engines that can rev smoothly to 10,000 RPM,
as in the case of the Honda
S2000. And Formula One engines now routinely touch
20,000 RPM when on full song.
The Wankel engine is ideal for
use in aircraft and is often used in drones and stealth
aircraft. But, of course, the military doesn't care
if an engine change is necessary
after every flight, they have the funds to so do.
The simplicity of design and
smaller size of the Wankel engine also allow for a
savings in construction costs, compared to piston
engines of comparable power
output, provided of-course that you don't have to recall
them all and replace most of them
- goodbye cost advantage.
The shape of the Wankel combustion
chamber and the turbulence induced by the moving
rotor prevent localized hot
spots from forming, thereby
allowing the use of fuel of very low octane number without
pre ignition or detonation, a particular
advantage for Hydrogen cars.
Mazda has recently placed a hydrogen-burning rotary
engine in one version of its RX-8 sports car.
This feature has also led
to a great deal of interest in countries where high octane
gasoline is unobtainable.
But the design of the Wankel
engine requires numerous sliding seals and a housing
that is typically built as a sandwich of cast iron
and aluminium pieces that
expand and contract by different degrees when exposed
to heating and cooling cycles in use.
These elements lead to a
very high incidence of loss of sealing, both between
the rotor and the housing and also between the
various pieces making up
the housing. Further engineering work by Mazda may
have brought these problems under control,
but the company is now confronted
with concerns over both hydrocarbon emissions and a
rise in the cost of gasoline, the two
biggest weaknesses of the
Wankel engine, even if it wasn't also an oil burner.
Just as the shape of the Wankel
combustion chamber prevents preignition, it also leads
to incomplete combustion of the air fuel
charge, with the remaining
unburned hydrocarbons released into the exhaust. At
first, while manufacturers of piston-engine cars
were turning to expensive
catalytic converters to completely oxidize the unburned
hydrocarbons, Mazda was able to avoid this cost
by enriching the air/fuel
mixture enough to produce an exhaust stream which was
rich enough in hydrocarbons to actually support
complete combustion in an
enlarged open chamber in the exhaust manifold without
the need for a catalytic converter, thereby
producing a clean exhaust
at the cost of some extra fuel consumption.
Unfortunately for Mazda, their
switch to this solution was immediately followed by
a sharp rise in the cost of gasoline so that not
only added fuel cost to their
design, but the basically lower fuel economy of the
Wankel engine caused sales to drop alarmingly.
A related cause for unexpectedly
poor fuel economy involves an inherent weakness of
the Wankel rotor design when used
with conventional fuels.
Some studies have indicated that at high speeds, the
rate at which the volume of the combustion chamber
increases in the moments
after ignition actually outpaces the expansion of the
burning fuel. The result is that, at high speeds,
less useful energy is extracted
from the same volume of fuel, as the exhaust has to expend
time and energy "catching up" to the
rotor before it can accomplish
any work.
Unlike a piston engine, where
the cylinder is cooled by the incoming charge after
being heated by combustion, Wankel rotor
housings are constantly heated
on one side and cooled at the other, leading to very
high local temperatures and unequal
thermal expansion. This places
high and probably unreasonable, demands on the materials
used.
Most of these disadvantages
have been solved in the Renesis engine of the RX-8. The exhaust ports, which
in earlier Mazda
rotaries were located in
the rotor housings, were moved to the sides of the
combustion chamber.