Feb 15, 2008
The Audi R8 was chosen 2008
Car of the Year and the Chevrolet Silverado was picked Utility Vehicle of
the Year
by Canadian auto journalists this week.
The Automobile Journalists Association
of Canada announced the winners at the media preview of the Toronto
auto show on Wednesday.
The other finalists for Car
of the Year were the Saturn Astra and Audi S5, while the Buick Enclave and
Nissan Rogue
were runners-up for Utility Vehicle of the Year (i.e., truck, SUV or crossover).
The Audi won Best New Design
as well, having previously been picked by the journalists as "most coveted"
during
last fall's three-day Test-Fest, where all new cars and utility vehicles are
put through their paces by members of AJAC.
Ford took Best New Technology
with its SYNC system, which enhances connectivity by allowing various electronic
devices
– Bluetooth phones, iPods, etc. – to be operated through the car's own control
systems.
With the exception of the Design
Award (the R8 is gorgeous by any measure) and "most coveted" (who wouldn't
want to
own this car?), all the other choices are steeped in controversy.
As my Grade 11 history teacher
Wally Coulthard used to say when we collectively got the wrong answers to
his pop quizzes:
"Another failure of democracy."
For starters, how can a $140,000
sports car, of which they'll sell maybe 100 in Canada, be Car of the Year?
Surely a Car of the Year should represent something that's within reach of
at least a measurable portion of the market?
Some such contests require that
a prospective winner sell a minimum number to be eligible
– a North American Car of the Year, for example, must be reasonably expected
to sell 5,000 units combined in the U.S.
and Canada.
AJAC has no such provision.
Can't blame the people at Audi. They don't make the rules, and they aren't going to hand back the trophy.
Beth Rhind, AJAC's manager, who
has worked on the Canadian Car of the Year program almost since its inception,
says that various safeguards have been built into the system to try to ensure
that an expensive exotic doesn't snatch
the title.
"The various attributes the journalists
vote upon are tempered by a price factor," she notes. In effect, expensive
cars
have to be better just to break even.
"Ten per cent of the vote also
goes to `market significance,'" she adds. You'd be hard-pressed to think any
journalist
would give a 100-unit car much credit here.
"Historically," continued Rhind,
"the average vote on any attribute is 6.8 out of 10. For the Audi to break
though these
various controls, the journalists must have given it 9s or 10s across the
board.
"We haven't had a chance to examine
the votes yet to see how this was done. In the 14 years since we started
the current
system, only one really expensive car, the BMW M3, has won the overall Car
of the Year. We are continually fine-tuning the
system to make it even better," she concludes.
On the other hand, Car of the Year is not a popularity contest or a sales award.
In that case, we would have such worthy members in our Hall of Fame as the Ford Tempo and Chevrolet Cavalier.
Marc Lachapelle, a Montreal-based
journalist and one of the key members of the Car of the Year group that
(with Wheels' own Gerry Malloy) initiated this system some years ago, noted,
"The Car of the Year is supposed to be special,
supposed to represent a breakthrough in some way. There can be no doubt in
anyone's mind that the Audi is a very special
car, in design, technology, and performance."
Personally, I think the wrong
Audi emerged from the threesome of finalists. The S5 has almost the same technology
and
performance, twice as many seats and costs half as much.
But for me, the real car of the
year didn't even make the final three: Chevrolet Malibu isn't as technologically
impressive as the
Audi, but it brings a host of attributes, not the least of which are affordability
and accessibility, which earned it this year's
North American title.
It didn't even win its category in AJAC, finishing third behind the Honda Accord and Subaru Impreza hatchback.
Only category winners are eligible to be voted on for overall Car of the Year.
On the Utility Vehicle side,
the Silverado is an impressive pickup, but nowhere near the breakthrough represented
by the
Buick Enclave.
And if "most improved" were part
of the judging process, the Nissan Rogue would have won in a walk, given that
it replaces
the lamentable X-Trail in Nissan showrooms.
Finally, I am already on record
as saying that Ford's SYNC simply enables more driver distraction in our
vehicles, which is
exactly what we don't need.
Winston Churchill once said that
democracy is the worst system of governance, except for all the others.
Winston, meet Wally Coulthard.
But as Maple Leaf fans say, wait till next year. We'll probably get it wrong again.